Skip to Main Content
Menu
Contact Us Search
California Law Revision Commission

-- Last revised 11/30/23 --

Relationship Between Mediation Confidentiality and Attorney Malpractice and Other Misconduct - Study K-402

    By concurrent resolution, the Legislature directed the Commission to analyze "the relationship under current law between mediation confidentiality and attorney malpractice and other misconduct, and the purposes for, and impact of, those laws on public protection, professional ethics, attorney discipline, client rights, the willingness of parties to participate in voluntary and mandatory mediation, as well as any other issues the commission deems relevant." 2012 Cal. Stat. res. ch. 108 (ACR 98 (Wagner & Gorrell)).

    In assigning this topic, the Legislature specifically requested that the Commission examine certain laws, court rulings, legal doctrines, scholarly commentary, and data. The Legislature further directed the Commission to seek input from experts and interested parties, including representatives of the California Supreme Court, the State Bar, legal malpractice defense counsel, other attorney groups and individuals, mediators, and mediation trade associations. The Legislature authorized the Commission to “make any recommendations that it deems appropriate for the revision of California law to balance the competing interests between confidentiality and accountability.”

    The Commission has completed its study as requested by the Legislature and has approved a final recommendation.

    At this time, the final recommendation is in pre-print form. The Commission has approved the substance of the report, but minor editorial changes may be made prior to final publication.

    Part I of the recommendation summarizes the Commission’s research for this study. Part II explains the Commission’s preliminary conclusions, which are the basis for the proposed legislation in Part III of the report.

    The recommendation is lengthy (158 pp.), but most of it consists of the research findings (Part I). The explanation and presentation of the Commission’s proposal (Parts II and III) are relatively short. See pp. 135-48.

Related Material


Final Recommendation

Top | CLRC Homepage

Tentative Recommendations and Other Requests for Comment

Top | CLRC Homepage

Meeting Minutes

Top | CLRC Homepage

Staff Memoranda

Top | CLRC Homepage

Additional Materials

Top | CLRC Homepage

Subscribe

If you would like to receive email notification when new materials relating to this study are added to the website, please complete the form below.

If you were already signed up to one of our mailing lists, you will receive an immediate error message. Click the link within that message to "update your profile." You will then be sent an email that you can use to choose which notice lists you wish to be on.

Subscribe

After you have submitted your address, you will receive an email asking you to confirm. This prevents someone else from signing you up.

Every message sent to you under this subscription will include instructions on how to unsubscribe.

Your email address will not be shared with any other person or group.